Evidence of a “kangaroo court” is mounting against Ashland County and its alleged co-conspirators at the Ashland Municipal Courthouse in Ohio.  Following a report exposing unlawful and unethical communications, local Ashland Attorney Jeffrey Honaker (long considered a “fixer” for the local judiciary) was documented purging his Facebook friends list of Judge John L. Good and that of Dave Hunter, the assistant law director. Simultaneously, Judge Good and other courthouse staff restricted portions of their social media profiles to hide their public associations.  It should be noted that Honaker’s father, David Honaker, also removed Assistant Law Director Dave Hunter from his friends list as well during the “coverup” phase.  These abrupt adjustments suggest a coordinated effort to conceal deep-seated biases and “extreme targeting” against a specific resident of the city (or a defendant in their corrupt viewpoint). Earlier sources had indicated that these individuals convened to discuss prohibiting further communication as well as the wholesale deletion of any and all potentially incriminating messages.

HONAKER’S ORIGINAL ARTILCE:

Ashland Ohio Attorney Jeffrey Honaker Exposed for Misconduct & Malpractice

The removal and or concealment of specific friends from Honaker’s Facebook page demonstrates a clear “consciousness of guilt”.  The fact that his father was also contacted and ordered to hide and or remove Dave Hunter (as well as others) shows the true nature of this beast, as well as a real element of authentic fear.  Typically found and only reserved for those that face the utmost propensity form of truth (from US).  Following the exposure of unethical communications with certain individuals, Honaker then chose to hide those exact contacts.  This action clearly appears to be yet another calculated effort to conceal evidence of prolonged misconduct and to obstruct further investigation. Whilst the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct do not prohibit attorneys from being social media friends with judges, prosecutors, or law directors, such associations are only lawfully allotted if communications remain consistent with the law and their respective oaths of office.  To which they most certainly have not…

ASSOCIATED ARTICLES: 

• https://scumbagged.com/2025/12/24/ohio-judge-allows-mother-to-prostitute-with-children-weaponizes-her-court-against-father/
• https://scumbagged.com/2026/01/13/1-13-2026-ashland-municipal-court-retaliates-again-this-time-after-exposing-court-fixer/
• https://scumbagged.com/2026/01/13/1-13-2026-corruption-probe-developing-exposure-event-in-ashland-ohio/
• https://scumbagged.com/2026/01/17/ashland-ohio-law-director-dave-hunter-deprives-victim-of-rights-obstructs-justice-neglects-duty/

EVIDENCE REPOSITORY

The seemingly minor adjustments to social media pages are, in truth, a smokescreen for something far more sinister. Combined with clandestine meetings, the destruction of evidence, and the re-alignment of integrity to hide corruption, this represents decades of misconduct culminating in the present day, in real-time. When you pair this with the county’s targeted, unlawful assault on a single individual, alongside the rushed scrubbing of Dave Hunter and other county officials (like Judge John L. Good) hiding their friends on their profiles, the picture becomes vivid, clear, pristine. The frantic reaction to a routine report tells us everything: Ashland County is a Kangaroo Court, and it will be proven as such, in due time.

Aëtos SAYS:  If Honaker and the Ashland Court’s did nothing wrong, if they did not have unethical communications (amongst a host of other law violations), then why would they bother to start scrubbing and making the kinds of changes talked about in this article?  The answer is simple, their guilty.  If you were innocent you simply wouldn’t care and you wouldn’t make these specific types of changes publicly (or privately).  And now my dearest faithful readers you know what a “a consciousness of guilt” looks like…

THE BOTTOM LINE

SCUMBAGGED TIP:  Ashland just couldn’t help themselves, they couldn’t leave enough alone, they couldn’t leave an innocent person alone – to be precise.  Perhaps, it was that they just couldn’t stand said individual living in a nicer part of the community, in a nicer home than them, with happy children and was viewed by them as more successful.  This person, is a person that they despised, someone who wasn’t like them in any facet and wasn’t, as they viewed, on the same “side of the isle as them” based on prehistoric undertones.  These corrupted individuals couldn’t stand for someone who didn’t have to clock in to work every single day like they did, they couldn’t stand for someone who was exceeding them in nearly every single fiber of the sense in pre-retirement life.  Alas, the tit-for-tat continues as does their undoing.  Until the next time (tomorrow) when another article runs on another corrupted partition of this KANGAROO COURT.  This isn’t the first person they’ve done these kinds of things to either, let’s all just keep that in mind…

If you have a story you would like to share, you can do so by emailing us, texting or calling us or submitting an article.  All communications are encrypted, secure, confidential and will be entirely anonymous unless you so choose to come forward publicly.

“During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act” – George Orwell