A Government Investigation into ATSDR (Public Health Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry) dating back to 2009 shows that they intentionally find zero cluster links or any links for that matter during investigations. The document found on this page is a report by the Majority Staff of the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight Committee on Science and Technology. The information has been kept from the public until now and is related specifically to a Government investigation into Public Health Agency For Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR).
I’m submitting this because I feel that it pertains to the Multiple Sclerosis cluster issue that is taking place in Wellington, Ohio. There have been an extreme number of outbreaks in that community and all of the investigatory research has netted zero environmental or contributing effects from local businesses (in Wellington).
In addition, my reasoning behind this submission of the following Government Investigation into Public Health Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry should shed some light into local residents from Wellington and even across the country as to why the investigations continuously come up with no new findings regarding Cancer and Multiple Sclerosis clusters.
The Document
We have highlighted the most important two paragraphs directly below – the full report can be found below the paragraphs.
The two paragraphs that standout:
“Yet time and time again ATSDR appears to avoid clearly and directly confronting the most obvious toxic culprits that harm the health of local communities throughout the Nation. Instead, they deny, delay, minimize, trivialize or ignore legitimate concerns and health considerations of local communities and well respected scientists and medical professionals.
Many independent scientists, medical professionals, local environmental groups and public health advocates believe that rather than objectively and aggressively trying to identify the source of reported health problems, ATSDR often seeks ways to avoid linking local health problems to specific sources of hazardous chemicals. Instead, says one current ATSDR scientist who spoke to the Committee on the condition of anonymity” (said the following).
“It seems like the goal is to disprove … concerns rather than actually trying to prove exposures”
The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR): Problems in the Past, Potential for the Future? Report by the Majority Staff of the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight Committee on Science and Technology U.S. House of Representatives to Subcommittee Chairman Brad Miller March 10, 2009 Introduction Last April the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight held a hearing on the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), a sister agency of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The hearing looked at how the Agency produced a scientifically flawed and misleading health consultation on the health hazards of potential formaldehyde exposures by survivors of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita living in travel trailers provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).1 Last September the Subcommittee issued a detailed staff report on our investigation which found that: ``The leadership of ATSDR obfuscated their role in reviewing and approving the February 2007 health consultation and attempted to abdicate their own responsibility for the Agency's fundamental failure to protect the public's health. Most disturbingly, as the Agency's troubled response to the formaldehyde fiasco unraveled, the leadership of ATSDR attempted to shift blame for the inappropriate handling of the incident to others, primarily [whistleblower Dr. Chris] De Rosa and his staff.'' 2 Unfortunately, the poor scientific integrity of ATSDR's formaldehyde health consultation and the weak leadership at the Agency that permitted the production of this misleading report which went uncorrected for so long--keeping the public in harm's way for a year longer than necessary--was not an isolated incident. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 ``Toxic Trailers: Have the Centers for Disease Control Failed to Protect Public Health?,'' Hearing before the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight, Committee on Science and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives, April 1, 2008, available here: http:// science.house.gov/publications/ hearings-markups-details.aspx?NewsID=2133 2 ``Toxic Trailers--Toxic Lethargy: How the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Has Failed to Protect the Public Health,'' Majority Staff Report, Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight, Committee on Science and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives, September 2008, available here: http://democrats.science.house.gov/ Media/File/Commdocs/ ATSDR-Staff-Report-9.22.08.pdf --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Agency's mission ``is to serve the public by using the best science, taking responsive public health actions, and providing trusted health information to prevent harmful exposures and disease related to toxic substances.''3 On paper, according to ATSDR, the Agency is deeply involved with the local communities it is intended to help protect, it makes independent, objective health decisions based on the best science available, it conducts exposure investigations to assess health impacts of environmental toxins and it provides and explains the results of their evaluations, medical consultations and investigations to local communities and tribes.4 In reality, across the Nation local community groups believe that ATSDR has failed to protect them from toxic exposures and independent scientists are often aghast at the lack of scientific rigor in its health consultations and assessments. The studies lack the ability to properly attribute illness to toxic exposures and the methodologies used by the Agency to identify suspected environmental exposures to hazardous chemicals are doomed from the start. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 ``Statement of Mission,'' Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, undated, available here: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ about/mission.html 4 ``What You Can Expect From ATSDR,'' Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, May 2002, available here: http:// www.atsdr.cdc.gov/COM/expect.pdf --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Subcommittee staff is not suggesting that ATSDR find problems where none exist or that ATSDR should or can identify the sources of a possible cancer cluster, disease or other health hazard in every instance or where the potential source of toxic exposures are ambiguous or elusive. Yet time and time again ATSDR appears to avoid clearly and directly confronting the most obvious toxic culprits that harm the health of local communities throughout the Nation. Instead, they deny, delay, minimize, trivialize or ignore legitimate concerns and health considerations of local communities and well respected scientists and medical professionals. Many independent scientists, medical professionals, local environmental groups and public health advocates believe that rather than objectively and aggressively trying to identify the source of reported health problems, ATSDR often seeks ways to avoid linking local health problems to specific sources of hazardous chemicals. Instead, says one current ATSDR scientist who spoke to the Committee on the condition of anonymity: ``It seems like the goal is to disprove the communities' concerns rather than actually trying to prove exposures.'' None of these problems are new to ATSDR but it will require a new will and desire to fix them on the part of ATSDR's leadership.
Related Article: Multiple Sclerosis in Wellington Exposed: The Highest Rate in The Country (Wellington, Ohio)
The Bottom Line: There have been almost zero links between companies that spew hazardous chemicals into the local community, or a combination of multiple companies spewing a variety of harmful byproducts into the community in Northeast Ohio. This is largely in part due to the mindset and position of investigatory outlets on behalf of the Government in an attempt to suppress potential widespread litigation (lawsuits).
SCUMBAGGED Tip: It’s safe to say that if you have a feeling you reside in an area that may be afflicted with extreme pollution or chemicals or harmful toxins, then you should remove yourself from the equation. Why take the chance? It’s not worth it…
[…] UPDATE 9/5/2018: A new submission has netted a document pertaining to a government investigation into the ATSDR, a government group who has repeatedly refused to formulate any links between the clusters and the local pollutants/toxins from local businesses. Government Investigation into ATSDR – Why Cluster Studies Fail to Find Causes […]